China’s Belt and Road Initiative, including its digital dimension, the Digital Silk Road (DSR), is often studied either top-down as ‘grand strategy’ or bottom-up from the perspective of sub-national agency. Applying political steering theory, this article examines tech-poor sub-national governments that operate within, rather than deviate from, central parameters. Through an interpretive policy analysis of Guangxi and Ningxia, this article argues that these regions developed international digitalization initiatives that, using the DSR for legitimization, absorb and evolve in line with successive Five-Year Plan priorities. It proposes the term ‘anchoring steering instrument’ to describe how these regions, as both steering subjects and objects, capture the DSR as a soft steering instrument to build an ‘anchoring’ platform, which expands and accumulates as it aligns with central steering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linda van der Horst (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: