BACKGROUND: Until recently, most treatments for haemophilia A consisted of regular prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy, which, to be effective, needed to be given multiple times per week. Efanesoctocog alfa is a once-weekly FVIII replacement therapy that has demonstrated highly effective bleed prevention in patients aged < 12 years with haemophilia A during the 52-week phase III XTEND-Kids trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04759131). OBJECTIVES: We conducted exit interviews with caregivers of XTEND-Kids trial patients to understand their experiences with efanesoctocog alfa. METHODS: Caregivers were asked questions, via telephone exit interviews, on their pre- and post-trial experiences to determine the impact of efanesoctocog alfa on their and their child's lives. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using an applied thematic analysis to identify key themes and trends. Quantitative data were obtained to inform the qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 19 caregivers of 20 children with haemophilia A. Prior to the trial, caregivers described substantial impacts on children's mood and emotional wellbeing (reported for 19/20 [95%] of the children by their caregivers), physical activity (14/20; 70%), and caregiver burden. After the switch to efanesoctocog alfa, most caregivers reported improvements across multiple domains, including reduced bleeding and bruising, improved mood and emotional wellbeing (18/19; 94.7%), and increased physical activity (10/14; 71.4%). All reported at least one improvement in their child; many described reduced treatment burden due to less frequent injections. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver-reported outcomes suggest that efanesoctocog alfa may meaningfully reduce disease and treatment burden, with improvements observed across children's daily functioning and emotional wellbeing, and caregiver experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: