Digital technologies have become infrastructural to contemporary education, reshaping pedagogy, institutional governance, and processes of subject formation. This article frames digital didactics as a philosophical problem of normativity under postdigital conditions: what educational purposes are enacted through platformised, datafied, and AI-mediated practices, and what kinds of subjects do these arrangements invite or compel? Against instrumental and solutionist framings of ‘what works,’ I propose edutropia as a normative horizon for rethinking digital didactics as ethical-political judgement and sociomaterial mediation. The argument proceeds through (1) a genealogy of digital didactics and its recurring alignment with rationalities of efficiency and control, (2) a postdigital reframing of technologies as sociomaterial assemblages traversed by power relations, and (3) a set of edutropic didactic turns oriented toward formation, mediation, and ethical responsibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gustavo Herrera-Urízar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: