Key result
Fractionated spinal anesthesia reduces hypotension requiring vasopressors ~50% versus conventional bolus dosing.
Why the study?
Does fractionated dosing of spinal anesthesia reduce the incidence of hypotension requiring vasopressors in elderly patients undergoing femur fracture surgery?
RCT (n=118)
double-blind
randomized
Does fractionated dosing of spinal anesthesia reduce the incidence of hypotension requiring vasopressors in elderly patients undergoing femur fracture surgery?
Relative Risk: 0.5 (95% CI 0.33–0.76)
Absolute Event Rate: 32.2% vs 64.4%
Number Needed to Treat: 3.1
p-value: p=0.0005
Fractionated dosing of spinal anesthesia significantly reduces the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirements in elderly patients undergoing femur fracture surgery compared to conventional bolus dosing.
Supports fractionated spinal dosing to reduce vasopressor needs in elderly hip fracture repair; confirms benefit over bolus in this RCT population.
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA), though preferred for lower limb orthopedic surgery, produces rapid sympathectomy following bolus intrathecal injection, which may precipitate significant hypotension in elderly patients. Fractionated dosing may improve hemodynamic stability. This study compared fractionated versus bolus SA on hypotension requiring vasopressor support. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial included 118 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III participants aged ≥60 years undergoing femur fracture surgery under SA. Participants were randomized to receive either fractionated dosing (two-thirds initial dose followed by one-third after 60 s) or conventional bolus dosing of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 60 μg intrathecal buprenorphine. Hemodynamics were recorded every 3 min for 30 min postinjection. The primary outcome was hemodynamic stability, prespecified as incidence of hypotension requiring vasopressors. Secondary outcomes included total vasopressor consumption, block characteristics, and adverse events. RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension requiring vasopressors was significantly lower in the fractionated group (19/59; 32.2%) compared with the bolus group (38/59; 64.4%) (P = 0.0005; relative risk: 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.76; number needed to treat 3.1). Total vasopressor requirement was also lower (5.68 ± 1.97 mg vs. 8.13 ± 4.35 mg; P = 0.0235). Sensory block duration was longer with fractionated dosing (224.9 ± 70.25 min vs. 199.25 ± 47.86 min; P = 0.0222), while block onset times, maximum sensory level, motor block duration, and adverse events were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated spinal dosing significantly reduces hypotension and vasopressor requirement in elderly femur fracture patients, while prolonging sensory block, without affecting motor recovery or safety profile. This simple technique may improve hemodynamic stability in this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sridharan et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in femur fracture (n=118). Fractionated spinal anesthesia vs. Conventional bolus dosing was evaluated on incidence of hypotension requiring vasopressors (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.76, p=0.0005). Fractionated spinal anesthesia significantly reduced hypotension requiring vasopressors compared to conventional bolus dosing (32.2% vs 64.4%; RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33-0.76; P=0.0005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: