Ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand balance is essential for regional sustainability, yet simultaneously optimizing multiple ESs remains challenging due to inherent trade-offs. This study investigates ES supply–demand patterns, trade-offs and synergies across multiple scales in the Loess Plateau (LP) in 2020, employing Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to quantify nonlinear responses and identify model-derived breakpoints of socio-ecological drivers affecting both the overall ES supply–demand ratio (CESDR) and trade-offs (ES trade-off ). Results showed that CESDR and ES trade-off exhibited a southeast–northwest gradient, with surplus and synergistic areas concentrated in the southeastern LP and deficits and stronger trade-offs in urbanized and northwestern regions. Based on ES supply–demand ratio (ESDR) bundles, the LP was delineated into four, five, and six sub-zones at the city, county, and town scales, respectively. GAM analyses revealed widespread nonlinear responses of CESDR and ES trade-off to socio-ecological drivers, with human activity-related factors exhibiting dominant negative influences. CESDR generally exhibited hump-shaped responses to forest and grassland proportions in most sub-zones, with diminishing or negative responses beyond certain ranges. By integrating multi-scale pattern analysis, ESDR-based zoning, and nonlinear response assessment, this study advances understanding of ES supply–demand dynamics and provides insights for ecological management in the LP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: