Introduction Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease with limited therapeutic options, highlighting the need for multi-target interventions. Traditional Chinese botanical medicine (TCBM) interventions have attracted increasing attention as potential multi-target pharmacological candidates for ALS. In addition, a separate body of evidence derived from selected plant-derived bioactive compounds directly investigated in ALS-specific models provides complementary mechanistic insights into ALS-related pathways. However, the pharmacological mechanisms and translational potential of these two distinct evidence categories remain insufficiently summarized. This review systematically summarizes ALS-related pathological mechanisms and the molecular actions reported within these two distinct evidence categories, together with translational challenges and future research directions. Methods A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect up to May 2026. A total of 198 publications were retained, including 48 ALS-specific original intervention studies forming the core pharmacological evidence set. Results ALS involves interconnected pathological processes, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired proteostasis, excitotoxicity, and neuromuscular junction injury. Evidence across these two categories suggests modulation of multiple ALS-related pathological processes. Reported effects include regulation of inflammatory signaling, enhancement of Nrf2-mediated antioxidant responses, improvement of PGC-1α/MFN2-associated mitochondrial homeostasis, and promotion of protein clearance pathways. Conclusion Together, these distinct but complementary evidence categories highlight the potential for multi-target modulation of ALS-related pathology. However, current evidence remains predominantly preclinical, and clinical efficacy and translational feasibility require further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: