Favipiravir, a pyrazine-carboxamide inhibitor of viral RNA-dependent RNApolymerase, requires a simple and reproducible chromatographic assay for routine quality control ofbulk drug and finished dosage forms. A reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographicmethod was therefore developed, optimised and validated in accordance with ICH Q2(R1).Separation was achieved on an Agilent 1260 Infinity system fitted with a C18 (2) 250 × 4.6 mm, 5µm column, using methanol and 0.02 M potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (75:25 v/v, pH3.5) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, an injection volume of 20 µL, a columntemperature of 30 °C and photodiode-array detection at 220 nm. Preliminary trials with methanol–water (75:25 v/v) produced peak broadening, and adjustment of that mobile phase to pH 3.0produced fronting and splitting; substitution of phosphate buffer for water at pH 3.5 gave a singlesymmetrical peak. Under the final conditions favipiravir eluted at 3.6 min with a capacity factor of1.56, 6,668 theoretical plates and a tailing factor of 1.03. The detector response was linear from 10 to70 µg/mL with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998 and %RSD of 1.08–1.49 across five replicateinjections at each level. Recovery determined by standard addition at 80%, 100% and 120% was99.47–100.30% (mean 99.94%), with %RSD of 0.78–1.18. Repeatability over six injections of a 20µg/mL solution gave %RSD 0.89, while intra-day and inter-day precision at 20, 30 and 40 µg/mLgave %RSD of 0.32–0.79 and 0.32–1.02 respectively. Deliberate variation of mobile-phasecomposition (±1% v/v), pH (±0.1), flow rate and column temperature gave %RSD of 0.28–0.79, andanalysis by two analysts gave 100.78 ± 0.40% and 100.22 ± 0.78%. The limit of detection and limitof quantitation were 0.45 and 0.60 µg/mL. Applied to bulk drug the method gave 99.86 ± 0.78% ofthe amount taken, and applied to a marketed 200 mg tablet formulation it gave 99.87 ± 0.73% of thelabel claim, with no evidence of excipient interference. The method is simple, rapid, economical andsuitable for routine assay and quality-control analysis of favipiravir.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dr. R. SUNDARARAJAN, Mrs. K. SUGANYA SRI, M.SYED ASHIFA, M.ACHUTHA, S. DIVYA BHARATHI, V.PUJAA, S.SASIKALA (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: