Purpose This study examined whether peak lactate accumulation rate ( v Lapeak) was associated with body-mass-normalised power at the first and second lactate turnpoints (LT1 rel and LT2 rel ) beyond relative maximal oxygen uptake (relative V̇O 2max ) and gross efficiency in cyclists and triathletes. Parallel models using maximal blood lactate accumulation rate ( v Lamax blood ) assessed whether the findings depended on the calculation approach. Methods 182 cyclists and triathletes (107 men, 75 women) completed a 15-s sprint test, an incremental lactate profile, and a ramp test to exhaustion. Hierarchical linear regression models included relative V̇O 2max and gross efficiency before adding either v Lapeak or v Lamax blood . Sex and sex × predictor interactions were examined exploratorily. Results Models including relative V̇O 2max , gross efficiency, and v Lapeak explained 75.3% of the variance in LT1 rel and 80.4% in LT2 rel . Adding v Lapeak increased explained variance by 4.9 and 5.0% points, respectively (both p < 0.001). Higher v Lapeak was associated with lower LT1 rel (B = − 0.803, 95% confidence interval − 1.070 to − 0.536) and LT2 rel (B = − 0.900, 95% confidence interval − 1.165 to − 0.635), whereas relative V̇O 2max and gross efficiency were positively associated with both outcomes. The v Lamax blood models showed the same direction and significance with similar fit. Sex and sex × predictor interactions did not improve the models. Conclusion Body-mass-normalised lactate turnpoint power reflects variation in aerobic power and efficiency as well as in the sprint-induced lactate accumulation response. Comparable findings for v Lapeak and v Lamax blood indicate that the associations were largely independent of whether the estimated alactic time interval was included in the calculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Röhrs et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: