The thin-walled circular hollow reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers provide favorable material efficiency, but their seismic shear strength is difficult to evaluate because hollow-section geometry and post-yield flexural damage can jointly reduce the available shear-transfer capacity. To address this problem, a mechanics-informed semi-empirical shear-strength formulation is developed for thin-walled circular hollow RC piers considering flexural-shear interaction. The shear resistance is decomposed into concrete, transverse-reinforcement, and longitudinal-reinforcement contributions. Circular hollow-section effects are represented through modifications of stirrup effectiveness, compression-zone depth, and effective shear area, while the average influence of accumulated flexural plastic deformation is incorporated through a displacement-ductility degradation coefficient. A database of 58 circular hollow RC pier specimens from previous studies is used to calibrate the data-dependent model terms. The formulation is subsequently evaluated using five quasi-static specimens from the present experimental program and six additional literature hold-out specimens. The mean prediction-to-test ratios are 0.97 and 1.09, with standard deviations of 0.06 and 0.07 for the two evaluation datasets, respectively. For the common six-specimen comparison with existing shear-strength models, the proposed formulation shows lower overall prediction error and dispersion, with the clearest improvement observed for the limited high-hollow-ratio specimens. The experimental observations are qualitatively consistent with progressive deterioration of the effective compression region and shear-transfer mechanisms after flexural yielding. However, the available validation remains limited and does not establish uniform superiority, failure-mode-independent accuracy, or extrapolation capability beyond the experimental envelope. The proposed formulation therefore provides a preliminary, computationally convenient framework for estimating the seismic shear strength of thin-walled circular hollow RC bridge piers within the parameter range represented by the available data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: