Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) delivers exceptional mechanical strength, yet its early-age gain often falls short of the tight schedules governing precast production and rapid on-site construction. Electro-thermal (EC) curing harnesses internal Joule heating without external heat sources or enclosed chambers, offering a field-deployable alternative; however, its efficacy is critically governed by the hydration age at activation. While EC has been explored for frost protection and functional self-heating, the optimal activation timing for strength-driven UHPC curing, specifically the activation window anchored to the conductive-network percolation state, remains unresolved. This study targets this gap by evaluating 3-hour EC curing applied to steel-fiber-reinforced UHPC at 24 h after casting, when the paste has entered the latter portion of the acceleration period, comparing constant 60 V (B3, high-intensity benchmark), 30→36 V stepped (B1, mild activation), and 45→60 V stepped (B2, intensified) protocols against a moist-cured reference. Through real-time thermal and electrical monitoring, mechanical testing at 3, 7, and 28 days, and coupled SEM/TGA characterization, we demonstrate that a 3-hour high-voltage activation increases 7-day compressive strength by 41% while preserving statistically comparable 28-day strength. The high-voltage EC flexural deficit diminishes under subsequent moist curing, with the 28-day value recovering to within 2–5% of the control; this trajectory is consistent with reactivated secondary hydration and points to a dehydration-mediated interfacial effect rather than irreversible chemical damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhongling et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: