The adoption of robotics in construction has progressed more slowly than in many other sectors. Building information models (BIMs) contain information that can support construction robotics, while robots require task-specific project data, such as geometry, location, material, sequence, and operating constraints, that may not be readily available in a directly usable form. This study proposes a conceptually integrated system architecture for BIM-to-robot information exchange comprising Task Planning, Task Decomposition, and anticipated Robot Task Execution linked by two information exchanges. A 20-concrete-masonry-unit (CMU) wall case study demonstrates selected information-preparation and documentation portions of the architecture. A low-LOD Revit wall was decomposed into individual CMUs using Dynamo, and component location (X, Y, Z, and orientation), material type, and identification (I.D.) information were extracted and formatted as robot-oriented task information. Because the available robotic platform lacked manipulation capability, a human worker interpreted the exported task information and constructed the wall, while a Husky A200 robot collected site images for dense point-cloud reconstruction. The reconstruction was superimposed on the source Revit model to qualitatively assess consistency between the constructed wall and the intended BIM-derived layout. The case study therefore demonstrates BIM-derived information generation and extraction, worker interpretation and use of the task information, and robot-assisted documentation, but it does not verify autonomous robotic construction. The primary contribution is the architectural integration of prior information-exchange and parametric-modeling methods across the end-to-end BIM-to-robot workflow, including explicit information requirements and exchange points; the term end-to-end refers to architectural scope rather than end-to-end experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McClymonds et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: