Grasping how structural dimensionality affects ion transport and redox processes is crucial for designing low-dimensional electrode materials. This research systematically compares two structurally distinct titanium sulfides, TiS 2 and TiS 3 , despite their identical elemental makeup Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that TiS 3 features significant anionic redox contribution from S 2 2− dimers, as substantiated by crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) and Bader charge analyses, whereas TiS 2 primarily involves cationic Ti 4+ /Ti 3+ redox processes. Climbing-image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) calculations reveal highly anisotropic Li + migration barriers. TiS 2 allows easy in-plane diffusion with a 0.28 eV energy barrier, but interlayer movement faces a high barrier of 1.80 eV. Conversely, TiS 3 enables intra-chain transport with a 0.22 eV barrier, yet struggles with inter-chain migration due to a 2.50 eV barrier. The GITT measurements reveal diffusion coefficients (D Li+ ) ranging from 1.57 × 10 −12 to 6.18 × 10 −12 cm 2 s −1 for TiS 2 and from 1.71 × 10 −12 to 1.92 × 10 −12 cm 2 s −1 for TiS 3 . Additionally, a continuum model, parameterized through DFT and implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics, establishes a connection between atomic-scale transport phenomena and macroscopic electrode behavior. This study creates a framework linking dimensionality, transport, and electrochemical properties to guide the design of advanced metal sulfide electrodes for future applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: