Background Assigned toll-road projects in Indonesia face persistent financial sustainability challenges due to declining fiscal capacity, dependence on government support, limited monetization of land-value uplift, and fragmented corridor governance. Existing toll-road business models remain highly dependent on tariff revenue and insufficiently integrate corridor-based value creation mechanisms. Methods This study developed the Toll Master Developer (TMD) concept using a sequential mixed-method design. The quantitative stage employed a survey of 70 respondents from government, toll-road companies, academia, and the private sector to identify strategic determinants of TMD effectiveness using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The qualitative stage applied Soft System Methodology (SSM) to formulate the institutional-business configuration of the proposed model. Results The findings demonstrate that TMD effectiveness is significantly influenced by four dimensions: strategic capability of toll-road developers (β = 0.71), spatial integration between toll roads and area development (β = 0.50), investment ecosystem (β = 0.40), and value capture mechanism implementation (β = 0.31). The SSM analysis further indicates that financially sustainable toll-road development requires toll-road developers to function not only as infrastructure operators but also as corridor coordinators and partial development authorities. The proposed TMD model integrates toll-road operations, area development, and land value capture into a corridor-based financing structure with diversified revenue streams beyond toll tariffs. Conclusions The study contributes a corridor-based institutional-business model that extends toll-road financing beyond tariff dependence toward integrated value creation and capture. The TMD concept provides a strategic pathway for improving the long-term financial sustainability of assigned toll-road infrastructure under constrained fiscal conditions in Indonesia by reducing dependence on government capital support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rinjayadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: