Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Considering the ongoing climate crisis, climate-related abstinence behavior (CRAB), defined as an individual’s voluntary tendency to abstain from climate-unfriendly behavior, is pivotal – along with other approaches – to reduce CO 2 emissions. The current study assesses CRAB across 40 different behavioral aspects (along with corresponding possibilities to enact a given, environmentally harmful behavior, the need to enact each behavior, as well as impact perceptions for each behavior). Principal component analysis on N = 467 participants suggested that the 40 behavioral aspects can be understood as domain-general. However, mixed-effects regression analysis indicated that variability in CRAB was accounted for at the person- and the behavior-specific level: (1) environmental affect, (2) the need to engage in a given, environmentally harmful behavior, and (3) the perceived impact of this behavior were significant predictors of CRAB. A latent profile analysis suggested three interpretable abstinence types. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krumm et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: