DECISION: REJECT ELEMENT: No element survives — the 5–10° phase-distance filter is statistically thin (p≈0.15–0.20 on n=164), reduces trade frequency by 15–25%, and risks overfitting to recent volatility regimes. The live-window improvement (5W/2L) is anecdotal, not causal, and the filter's interaction with existing rizzy5m/rizzy7m/wkjudas logic could double-filter fast-trend breakouts, degrading E8's core FADE polarity edge. EXPECTED IMPACT: If adopted, win-rate might rise ~1.0–1.4pp on filtered trades, but absolute PnL likely falls due to 15–25% fewer entries and potential exclusion of asymmetric large winners outside the band. Net profit impact: neutral-to-negative. RISK: Phase-distance band is regime-dependent; a shift in market phase dynamics could systematically exclude high-quality breakouts. Also, the filter may amplify selection bias if rejected trades (like the open USDCHF) later become winners. TEST: Before any reconsideration, run a 30-day shadow test logging phase Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Stewart Caldin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: