Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nickel sulfate (NiSO 4 ) and cobalt sulfate (CoSO 4 ) are key cathode precursors for lithium nickel–cobalt–manganese (NCM) batteries; however, their production raises important sustainability concerns. Existing studies often overlook the diversity of upstream products, the role of Chinese refining activities, and the co-production of nickel and cobalt chemicals. This study integrates enterprise data from China's domestic refining sector with upstream processing for NiSO 4 and CoSO 4 production, providing a comprehensive evaluation of their carbon footprint (CF) characteristics across typical production routes. The results show that the average CFs of NiSO 4 and CoSO 4 are 5.60 and 5.15 tCO 2 -eq/t, respectively. Energy consumption accounts for the dominant share of emissions, while ore grade, production scale, and fuel type also exert significant influences. Hydrometallurgical routes result in a higher CF for NCM811 and NCM523 batteries than pyrometallurgical routes. This analysis highlights critical opportunities to mitigate emissions through technological shifts, cleaner energy systems, and material recycling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: