Lithology-dependent blasting fragmentation remains a critical challenge in rock engineering, with representative hard- and soft-rock cases exhibiting contrasting damage and fragmentation responses. This study conceptualizes these responses as a lithology-controlled energy partitioning problem linking single-hole energy transmission and damage evolution to multi-hole fracture coalescence and fragmentation control. A fluid-structure interaction model was established in ANSYS/LS-DYNA and validated against blasting tests and dynamic-response characteristics. The effects of charge radius, borehole radius, and borehole medium were examined to clarify how lithology controls energy partitioning between near-borehole crushing and crack extension. The results indicate that soft rock is more sensitive to energy input, with a crushing-ratio growth coefficient 1.52 times that of hard rock, whereas hard rock is more sensitive to radial-decoupling-induced weakening of borehole-wall loading. High-transmission borehole media promote crack extension in hard rock but intensify near-borehole crushing in soft rock. These differences persist in multi-hole blasting: hard rock develops more concentrated inter-hole stress-wave interactions and straighter presplit fractures, whereas soft rock shows stronger near-borehole dissipation and more diffuse non-target damage, with fractal dimension used as an auxiliary evaluation tool for fracture complexity. In production blasting, diagonal delayed initiation facilitates crack coalescence and reduces oversized fragments, with the three-parameter generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution used to characterize fragmentation. A multi-index evaluation criterion and a staggered borehole pattern with distributed low-charge multi-hole loading were proposed to coordinate damage control, fragment size, and fragmentation uniformity in soft rock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: