Level 4 Electrical Engineering students enter laboratories with variable digital confidence. Pass/fail grading can mask partial competence, reduce motivation, and limit feedback. This session presents an inclusive redesign of a Level 4 Professional Practice laboratory (Electrical Circuits) to strengthen confidence, fair assessment, and progression, aligned with LJMU Strategy 2030 and the Framework for High Quality Teaching and Learning. I integrate MATLAB/Simulink modelling with hands-on bench validation in a ‘model-to-bench’ workflow. Support includes staged onboarding, just-in-time micro-tutorials, weekly formative checkpoints, and structured peer collaboration (with a mid-semester peer-review). Assessment moves beyond completion to core competencies: modelling, measurement, interpretation, troubleshooting, and communication, using transparent criteria and rapid feedback. Impact was evaluated across two cohorts (n=26; survey response rate=98 %) using student surveys, rubric-scored artefacts, onboarding analytics, checkpoint outcomes, and reflective logs. Student voice evidenced higher confidence: 94% of respondents strongly agreed they could apply their knowledge. Analytics revealed pinch-points (onboarding, debugging)informing scaffolds such as staged practice, simplified checklists, and early low-stakes feedback. At the module level, troubleshooting competency rose from 84 % in Week 4 to 93 % by Week 9. The approach also supported undergraduate research and employability: two former students co-authored Q1 papers, and one secured an Airbus UK role, attributing readiness to the combined MATLAB and practical competencies. Developed with TEL/Library input, the toolkit is transferable across programs and professional services: diagnostics to tailor onboarding, embedded micro-tutorials, a checkpoint rhythm for timely feedback, and competency rubrics to move beyond pass/fail. Attendees will leave with a transferable toolkit to adapt across programmes: (1) diagnostic to tailor onboarding; (2) embedded micro-tutorials; (3) weekly checkpoints for timely, clear feedback; (4) peer-review to build belonging; (5) competency rubrics enabling a staged shift beyond pass/fail, with adaptable templates for rapid adoption across disciplines and professional services. Beyond Pass/Fail: Competency Based Labs. Only LJMU staff and students have access to this resource.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamed Etarhouni (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: