Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat, and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are associated with worse outcomes than susceptible infections. Pharmacists are central to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), yet their impact in confirmed MDRO infections is unclear. We evaluated pharmacist-involved AMS on clinical and process outcomes in MDRO infections and quantified pooled effects on clinical outcomes. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, seven databases were searched (inception–December 2025) for pharmacist-involved AMS studies in patients with confirmed MDRO infections (Tier A) or in mixed populations from which MDRO-specific outcomes were extractable (Tier B), classified into Tier A, B, or C by outcome extractability. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed a priori for outcomes with ≥2 studies, with fixed-effect sensitivity and GRADE ratings. Results: Forty-nine studies were included (7 Tier A, 6 Tier B, 36 Tier C); quantitative synthesis was restricted to the 13 Tier A/B studies with MDRO-specific outcome data, and certainty of evidence was very low for all five pooled outcomes. Pharmacist involvement consistently improved process outcomes (time to therapy, de-escalation, antimicrobial consumption) and reduced mortality and readmissions in several subgroups. Pooled random effects RRs (95% CI) were: 30-day mortality, 0.64 (0.41–1.00; I2 = 28%, non-significant); in-hospital mortality, 0.72 (0.57–0.92; I2 = 6%, significant); 30-day readmission, 0.50 (0.31–0.79; I2 = 0%, significant); recurrent infection, 0.51 (0.25–1.04); and acute kidney injury, 1.01 (0.54–1.87; both non-significant, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Multicomponent AMS interventions involving pharmacists were consistently associated with improved stewardship processes and significant reductions in in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission, though evidence certainty remained very low. Larger, prospective studies with harmonized outcome definitions are needed to confirm the clinical benefit’s magnitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: