Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pulsed demand couples power sharing with supercapacitor (SC) depletion in proton-exchange-membrane fuel-cell (PEMFC) hybrid systems. In the evaluated controller, load-current slew rate adjusts fuel-cell (FC) and battery filter time constants and weights a bounded SC-voltage recovery request. Recovery enters the generation target before allocation, while the SC follows residual demand. Switched-model comparisons distinguish recovery, time-constant selection and recovery weighting. Under the synthetic 120 s load, dynamic allocation without recovery reaches the depletion trigger at 102.46 s; enabling recovery completes the window at 414.59 V. With unit recovery weight, dynamic allocation reduces battery-current root-mean-square (RMS) magnitude and bus-error RMS by 13.32% and 20.97% relative to a fixed comparator matched by mean filter-update coefficients, while SC-current RMS increases by 46.15%. Matching uses the same load and does not establish optimal fixed tuning. Against a disclosed Yang short-term adaptation, the controller instead reduces SC-current RMS by 24.19% while increasing battery-current RMS by 51.03%. Dynamic recovery weighting has small, mixed effects. Load and parameter tests, including 360 s records with late regulation loss under enhanced recovery, delimit these observations. The contribution is a coordination design with evidence of conditional load-sharing and recovery tradeoffs, without a universal performance, lifetime or efficiency ranking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Che et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: