Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A protocol aware machine learning framework enables prediction and selection of flooding recovery strategies in open cathode PEM fuel cells without measuring the recovery transient. Four recovery modes, step-up, pulse-up, ramp-up, and short-circuit pulse, are characterized over 102 training and 24 blind validation runs. Recovery time is defined as the time to settle within a ±5 mV band of the final value. Using operating and protocol variables and a polarization derived cell state descriptor, a single Random Forest predicts, without mode specific rules, the settling band time (R 2 = 0.887, nMAE = 9.0%), settling voltage (R 2 = 0.897), peak voltage (R 2 = 0.874), and overshoot (R 2 = 0.622). An MLP branch conditioned on these Random Forest metrics visualizes the corresponding recovery curves. Objective weighted TOPSIS and VIKOR then convert the predicted metrics and the fan parasitic energy into a condition dependent recovery protocol recommendation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: