Key result
Elite badminton singles elicit greater physiological demands and internal match loads than doubles.
Observational (n=70)
Singles badminton events elicit greater physiological demands and internal match load per minute compared to doubles events.
Temporal variables associate with internal load and higher demands in singles; observational data leave open training or performance implications.
This study aimed to compare activity profiles, heart rate (HR) responses, and internal match load (IML), and to examine their relationships in all badminton events during national tournament matches. Seventy national-level badminton athletes (men = 42; women = 28) were monitored in national tournaments across all badminton events, men's singles (MS), women's singles (WS), men's doubles (MD), women's doubles (WD), and mixed doubles (XD). Matches were video recorded to determine temporal variables ( i.e., total time, effective playing time – EPT, rally time, rest time, longest rally, and work density). HR was continuously monitored to determine mean and maximum HR ( i.e., HR mean and HR max ) and IML. WD is showing greater EPT, longer rally times, a longer longest rally, and higher work density. Singles events also showed greater EPT and rally times than MD and XD. Singles events elicited greater HR max , HR mean , and higher IML per minute (IML _min ) than doubles events. Additionally, IML showed significant associations with temporal variables ( β = 0.32–0.61). These findings indicate that the temporal and physiological demands differ across events, with singles eliciting greater IML _min. The IML may be a useful indicator for monitoring the relationship between activity profile and physiological stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araujo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in National-level badminton athletes (n=70). Singles badminton events vs. Doubles badminton events was evaluated on Activity profiles, heart rate responses, and internal match load (IML). Internal match load during elite badminton matches showed significant associations with temporal variables (β = 0.32–0.61), with singles events eliciting greater physiological demands than doubles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: