Climate change is also a crisis of narrative, scale, perception, and moral imagination. This PRISMA 2020- and PRISMA-S-aligned qualitative systematic review maps English-language literary-climate scholarship published from 2000 to 2025. Searches run in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection on 1 July 2026 identified 1866 records; 407 duplicates and 235 ineligible document types were removed, leaving 1224 records for screening and 375 database reports for eligibility assessment. Core-journal hand-searching and citation chasing identified 20 candidates: two duplicated database records, three reports could not be retrieved, and 15 new studies were included. After second-coder reconciliation and two corrected database eligibility decisions, the final synthesis comprised 173 studies. Most studies were published in 2020–2025 (138; 79.8%). Novels/climate fiction formed the largest literary category (104; 60.1%), climate criticism was the largest theoretical orientation (64; 37.0%), interpretive textual/theoretical analysis was the main method (121; 69.9%), and climate fiction and futurity was the dominant theme (115; 66.5%). The review identifies substantial growth and methodological diversification, while also showing persistent linguistic, geographic, and generic asymmetries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail Suliman Almazaidah (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: