Galaxy images encode internal morphology through phase relations that are not retained by low-order shape summaries. We formulate a three-dimensional parity test that directly couples the Wigner function shapelet (WFS) modes of two galaxies before compressing either image into a local pseudoscalar. Because images at different sightlines are defined on distinct tangent planes, we introduce canonical left-handed pair frames and compare the endpoint modes by parallel transport along the shortest great circle. In the Hermitian quadratic pair-covariance sector, independently tracking spatial parity, pair exchange, and rotation charge yields two classes of unordered-pair pseudoscalars: Type I observables require no line-of-sight factor, whereas Type II observables use a parity-even, pair-exchange-odd line-of-sight factor. We further decompose the directly measured parity-odd covariance as PT=PG+PK, where PG is the Gaussian exchange contribution and PK is the connected four-point image-mode contribution. Controlled numerical tests reproduce the geometric transformation laws to machine precision and recover the Type I/II response matrix with maximum cross-talk 5.735×10⁻⁴, while separating Gaussian-only, connected-only, and mixed hierarchies. Midpoint and angular-bisector conventions converge as O(ϑ²) in the plane-parallel limit but define distinct wide-angle Type II templates with normalized overlap $0.7049$; their signal transfer agrees with the analytic prediction. In $9000$ realizations with Ngal=96, $192$, and $384$, pair-independent errors underestimate the covariance, giving 95~{%} coverage of $0.7913$ at Ngal=384, whereas a 24-region spatial jackknife recovers $0.9442$. Once a line-of-sight convention is fixed, the framework is independent of the external coordinate system and provides a measurement-level basis for connecting mechanism-dependent physical responses to survey-specific observational transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: