Turbulence regulates star formation by influencing the density structure and fragmentation of molecular clouds, and therefore it is expected to play a key role in setting the initial mass function (IMF). We study how the strength of the turbulent shocks affects star formation and the IMF by comparing a series of magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) simulations of star cluster formation in clouds with three different rms Mach number values, M=2.5, 5, and 10, but otherwise the same Alfvén Mach number (MA~ 3) and virial parameter (αvir ~ 0.5). All three simulations include stellar feedback in the form of protostellar jets/outflows and accretion heating. We find that the star formation rate per freefall time (SFRff) for the M=10 model is higher by a factor of ~3 compared to the M=2.5 and 5 cases, which have similar SFRff. In terms of the IMF, the M=5 and 10 models produce almost similar distributions, resembling typical observed IMFs. The M=2.5 model, on the other hand, produces a bimodal IMF with a primary peak at supersolar masses (~2 M⊙) and a secondary peak in the substellar regime (<0.1 M⊙). The M=2.5 and 5 simulations producing significantly different IMFs while having similar SFRff, suggest that a distinct set of physical processes governs the SFR and IMF. Through a resolution study for the M=2.5 case, we find our base models have reached near numerical convergence, potentially only slightly underestimating close-binary formation. We also see signatures of bimodality in the M=2.5 model for the multiplicity fraction and stellar angular momentum distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: