A simulation-based design evaluation. No system has been built or tested; every performance figure is a model prediction from stated assumptions. Submitted to The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. An automated architecture for opening and closing a 92-bolt, three-flange delayed-coking drum (orbital pneumatic torque runners, a bolt carousel, a counterbalanced head manipulator and an interlocking sequence controller) is tested against the targets originally claimed for it. A Monte Carlo model built on the actual star-pattern tool travel shows that one torque head per flange needs a median 7.96 h to unbolt and re-bolt the drum and, within the investigated parameter bounds, cannot meet a 2.5 h target. Removing bottlenecks in turn gives 2.28 h with four synchronised heads and 1.82 h with a bolt-transfer channel per head, the configuration the analysis supports for experimental development (98 % of samples within 2.5 h); one fewer star pass would give 1.60 h but requires qualification. The ranking of architectures held across all 20,000 simulated samples under uniform, triangular and correlated input models. An exactly optimised tool path (Held-Karp, load-spreading constraint) adds little, and the complete operation remains about 3.4 h, governed by head handling and leak testing; a servicing-time envelope is derived. Specifying ±2 % torque accuracy barely affects preload scatter, which nut-factor variation dominates; under an assumed 3 % angle-based preload-estimate uncertainty, torque-angle re-torque cuts bolts outside ±10 % of target from 32 % to 5 %. Explicit-state verification of the interlock logic found no violation of seven safety invariants but exposed deadlocks after interrupted sequences (1,232 of 2,105 reachable states for a 12-bolt flange), which a resume rule removed; mutation tests confirm each invariant can fail. Pneumatic head handling needs a counterbalance carrying most of the load. An experimental validation and falsification plan with acceptance criteria is given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon Sandler (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: