Why the study?
Specific training and competence are required for performing TEE successfully, safely, and with minimum patient discomfort, necessitating standardized guidelines.
Provides comprehensive guidelines from the Indian Academy of Echocardiography for the performance, patient selection, and specific views of transesophageal echocardiography in adults.
Guides standardized TEE protocols in adults; extends prior international recommendations with India-specific detail.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has unique advantages over conventional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Compared with TTE, TEE generally provides excellent quality images, especially of the posteriorly situated cardiac structures, such as atria, pulmonary veins, mitral valve, and left atrial appendage. TEE also offers a useful alternative to TTE in patients in whom transthoracic acoustic windows are suboptimal. Furthermore, TEE is the most suited imaging modality for use in the operating rooms and cardiac catheterization labs for guiding cardiac surgical or interventional procedures. However, specific training and competence are required for performing TEE successfully, smoothly, safely and with minimum patient discomfort. This document describes the basic principles of TEE examination, including patient selection and preparation, periprocedural monitoring, and probe handling and maneuvers. Commonly recommended views and the techniques to obtain these views are described in detail, followed by evaluation of specific cardiac structures. Finally, the role of TEE in certain specific clinical settings, such as during advanced circulatory support, is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burkule et al. (2021) conducted a review in Indications for transesophageal echocardiography. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) vs. Conventional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was evaluated. Transesophageal echocardiography guidelines detail basic principles, patient selection, probe maneuvers, and specific clinical applications for adult patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: