OBJECTIVE/METHODS: We compared short-term outcomes following 40 traditional, cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to the first 40 cemented robotic-arm assisted TKA (raTKA) and analyzed the learning curve for raTKA. RESULTS: LOS was longer for traditional TKA compared to raTKA (1.92 vs. 1.27days, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in surgical time between the second 20 raTKA and all traditional TKA cases (81.1 vs. 78.3 mins, p = 0.254). raTKA patients had improved 90-day ROM (+3.8° vs. -8.7°, p < 0.05) but comparable complications rates, Knee Society Scores, and patient-reported outcomes at all timepoints. CONCLUSION: Despite comparable outcomes, the learning curve for raTKA appeared to progress rapidly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naziri et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: