Key result
16-lead HD-ECG appears more sensitive than standard 12-lead ECG for detecting abnormalities in CAD and ARVD.
Why the study?
Depolarization abnormalities are difficult to detect by standard 12-lead ECG in some patients with structural heart disease.
Does a 16-lead HD-ECG machine improve the detection of conduction abnormalities compared to standard 12-lead ECG in patients with structural heart disease?
Case Report (n=3)
Does a 16-lead HD-ECG machine improve the detection of conduction abnormalities compared to standard 12-lead ECG in patients with structural heart disease?
A novel 16-lead HD-ECG may offer greater sensitivity than standard 12-lead ECG for detecting subtle depolarization abnormalities in patients with structural heart disease.
Does not support routine 16-lead HD-ECG adoption; leaves open need for prospective validation in structural heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Depolarization abnormalities are hardly detectable by standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in some patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of the 16-lead High-Definition (HD)-ECG machine to record conduction abnormalities including Epsilon waves in patients with structural heart disease. METHODS: Tracings with 12-lead ECG, 16-lead HD-ECG, and signal-averaged ECG were studied. RESULTS: (1) Case of severe coronary artery disease (CAD): On 16-lead HD-ECG, a tiny intra-QRS signal was noted in lead III, a prolonged P wave in lead II, and fragmentation on top of lead aVL and lead aVF. Proper automatic measurement of the prolonged P wave measuring 190 ms was noted. Signal-averaging by 16-lead HD-ECG in lead III showed the intra-QRS fragmentation and P wave prolongation of 180 ms. (2) First patient with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD): Standard 12-lead ECG indicated Epsilon waves in lead III, V2, V3, and inverted T waves in V1-V3. 16-lead HD-ECG indicated QRS prolongation in lead II, III, aVL, aVF, V2, V3 as opposed to V6, and low amplitudes of QRS complexes in V4R and V3R as a new possible sign of ARVD. Notches in lead V2, widening of QRS complexes in all precordial leads, but shorter QRS in V8-V9 are also considered as a potential new diagnostic sign of ARVD. (3) Second ARVD patient: Notches at the end of the QRS in lead III and a negative initial deflection of the QRS in V1 and V2 were detected by standard 12-lead ECG. On 16-lead HD-ECG, a more pronounced QRS fragmentation was visible. CONCLUSION: 16-lead HD-ECG in both CAD and ARVD seems to be more sensitive than 12-lead ECG to record electrocardiographic abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2018) conducted a case report in Structural heart disease (CAD and ARVD) (n=3). 16-lead High-Definition (HD)-ECG vs. Standard 12-lead ECG was evaluated on Detection of conduction abnormalities. 16-lead HD-ECG appeared more sensitive than standard 12-lead ECG for detecting electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with CAD and ARVD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: