Key result
Aortic wall thickness on MDCT is not associated with CAD presence or severity.
Why the study?
Coronary and aortic atherosclerosis may be associated, but the relationship between aortic wall thickness measured by MDCT and presence or severity of CAD is unclear.
Is MDCT-measured thoracic aortic wall thickness associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=350)
Yes
Is MDCT-measured thoracic aortic wall thickness associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients?
p-value: p=0.31
Aortic wall thickness measured by MDCT is not an independent predictor of the presence or severity of coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients.
MDCT aortic wall thickness should not inform CAD assessment in symptomatic patients; leaves open its value as a biomarker in other populations.
INTRODUCTION: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a dispersed pathology involving the coronary arteries, carotid arteries, aorta and peripheral arteries. It has been previously suggested that coronary and aortic atherosclerosis may be associated. Imaging of the aorta and the aortic wall can be performed by various imaging modalities including state-of-the-art multidetector computer tomography (MDCT). This study aimed to investigate a possible association between the MDCT-measured thickness of the thoracic aorta and the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as its severity. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty candidates of coronary computer tomography angiography (CTA) with signs and symptoms suggestive of CAD were recruited in Tabriz Parsian and Iran CTA Centers. Contrast-enhanced MDCT examinations were performed using a 64 detector scanner. Maximum aortic wall thickness in the mid-portion of descending thoracic aorta (region of pulmonary trunk to diaphragm) was measured perpendicular to the center of the vessel. RESULTS: CAD was confirmed in 189 cases (54%) and the remaining 161 cases served as controls. The mean age of the cases, as well as the percentage of male subjects was significantly higher in the CAD group. The mean aortic wall thickness was also significantly higher in the patient group (2.21±0.63 mm vs. 1.88±0.58 mm; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, however, the two groups turned up comparable as to the aortic wall thickness (P=0.31). The optimal cut-off point of aortic wall thickness was ≥2 mm in discriminating between CAD+ and CAD- groups, with a corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 65% and 57%, respectively. There was no significant association between aortic wall thickness and the severity of CAD (the number of significantly occluded coronary arteries). CONCLUSION: Aortic wall thickness is apparently neither an independent predictor of CAD nor is it associated with the severity of CAD in candidates of CTA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quran et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=350). Aortic wall thickness was evaluated on Presence of coronary artery disease (p=0.31). Aortic wall thickness measured by MDCT was not an independent predictor of coronary artery disease (multivariate P=0.31) nor was it associated with CAD severity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: