Key result
Poor coronary collateral circulation is linked to ~56% higher median plasma NT-pro-BNP levels.
Why the study?
The relationship between coronary collateral circulation and plasma NT-pro-BNP levels, a marker of myocardial wall stress, was not well established.
Does poor coronary collateral circulation correlate with higher plasma NT-pro-BNP levels in patients with totally occluded main coronary arteries?
Observational (n=130)
No
Does poor coronary collateral circulation correlate with higher plasma NT-pro-BNP levels in patients with totally occluded main coronary arteries?
Absolute Event Rate: 1319% vs 847%
p-value: p=0.004
Poor coronary collateral circulation is associated with higher plasma NT-pro-BNP levels and lower LVEF in patients with totally occluded main coronary arteries, suggesting a protective effect of collaterals on ventricular function.
Association with higher NT-proBNP in poor collaterals may reflect greater wall stress; leaves open whether collaterals protect ventricular function in total occlusions.
OBJECTIVE: There have been numerous investigations demonstrating protective effects of awell- grown coronary collateral circulation (CCC) on left ventricular systolic function. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) is released by ventricular myocardium as a result of increased myocardial wall stress. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between CCC and plasma NT-pro-BNP levels. METHODS: Study group was retrospectively selected from patients who had a coronary angiography at our center between January 2008 and December 2009. One hundred and thirty patients having at least one totally occluded main coronary artery were included in this study. Collateral circulation was graded according to Rentrop score. Grade 0 and 1 are regarded as poor, and grade 2 and 3 - good CCC. Plasma NT-pro-BNP levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured by modified Simpson method. We used Chi-square, Student t and Mann-Whitney-U tests for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall 57 patients were found to have poor CCC and 73 patients have good CCC. Plasma NT-pro-BNP levels (pg/ml)-median (minimum-maximum)- were 1319 (48-9753) in poor CCC group and 847 (16-5529) in good CCC group (p=0.004). LVEF was found to be -median (minimum-maximum)- 45% (30-55%) in poor CCC group and 50% (30-60%) in good CCC group (p=0.003). Correlation analysis demonstrated that collateral grade was negatively correlated with NT-pro-BNP levels (r=-0.252, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: We found that plasma NT-pro-BNP levels were more elevated in patients with poor CCC than in patients with good CCC. This finding may be explained with the protective effect of good CCC on LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadı et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Totally occluded main coronary artery (n=130). Poor coronary collateral circulation vs. Good coronary collateral circulation was evaluated on Plasma NT-pro-BNP levels (pg/ml) (p=0.004). Patients with poor coronary collateral circulation had significantly higher median plasma NT-pro-BNP levels compared to those with good collateral circulation (1319 vs 847 pg/ml; p=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: