Key result
Systematic hs-cTnT screening proves cost-effective after noncardiac surgery at €425 per additional PMI detected.
Why the study?
Little is known about the cost-effectiveness of a systematic peri-operative myocardial injury screening strategy using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T after major noncardiac surgery.
Does a systematic screening strategy measuring hs-cTnT improve cost-effectiveness for detecting peri-operative myocardial injury in high-risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery compared with usual care?
Cohort (n=1,477)
No
Does a systematic screening strategy measuring hs-cTnT improve cost-effectiveness for detecting peri-operative myocardial injury in high-risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery compared with usual care?
Effect estimate: ICER €425 per additional PMI detected
Systematic peri-operative screening with hs-cTnT is a cost-effective strategy in the short-term for detecting myocardial injury in high-risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.
€425 per additional PMI detected short-term; leaves open long-term cost-effectiveness and outcome impact of systematic hs-cTnT screening.
BACKGROUND: About 300 million surgeries are performed worldwide annually and this figure is increasing constantly. Peri-operative myocardial injury (PMI), detected by cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation, is a common cardiac complication of noncardiac surgery, strongly associated with short- and long-term mortality. Without systematic peri-operative cTn screening, most cases of PMI may go undetected. However, little is known about cost effectiveness of a systematic PMI screening strategy with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) after noncardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess, in patients with high cardiovascular risk, the cost-effectiveness of a systematic screening strategy using a hs-cTnT assay, to identify patients with PMI after major noncardiac surgery, compared with usual care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis; single centre prospective cohort study. SETTING: Spanish University Hospital. PATIENTS: From July 2016 to March 2019, we included 1477 consecutive surgical patients aged ≥65 or if <65, with documented history of cardiovascular disease or impaired renal function, who underwent major noncardiac surgery and required at least an overnight hospital stay. We excluded patients aged <65 years without cardiovascular disease, undergoing minor surgery, or with an expected <24 h hospital stays. INTERVENTIONS: We conducted a decision-tree analysis, comparing a systematic screening strategy measuring hs-cTnT before surgery, and at the 2nd and 3rd days after surgery vs. a usual care strategy. We considered a third-party payer perspective and the outcomes of both strategies in the short-term (30 days follow-up). Information about costs was expressed in Euros-2021. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the systematic hs-cTnT strategy, defined as the expected cost per any additional PMI detected, and explored the robustness of the model using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ICER of the systematic hs-cTnT screening strategy. RESULTS: The ICER was €425 per any additionally detected PMI. The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that a 15% variation in costs, and a 1% variation in the predictive values, had a minor impact over the ICER, except in case of the negative predictive value of the systematic hs-cTnT screening strategy. Monte Carlo simulations (probabilistic sensitivity analysis) showed that systematic hs-cTnT screening would be cost-effective in 100% of cases with a 'willingness to pay' of €780. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that systematic peri-operative PMI screening with hs-cTnT may be cost-effective in the short-term in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Economic evaluations, with a long-term horizon, are still needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03438448.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popova et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Peri-operative myocardial injury after major noncardiac surgery (n=1,477). Systematic hs-cTnT screening strategy vs. Usual care was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the systematic hs-cTnT screening strategy (ICER €425 per additional PMI detected). Systematic hs-cTnT screening for peri-operative myocardial injury after major noncardiac surgery was cost-effective, with an ICER of €425 per additional PMI detected.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: