Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
X-ray-selected BL Lacs (XBLs) are generally thought to outnumber the more extreme radio-selected objects (RBLs), on the grounds that their properties could be understood if the X-ray jet were broader than the radio one. Here we present an alternative explanation: RBLs and XBLs may well be two aspects of the same population, whose main difference is the frequency of the high-energy cut-off in their energy distribution, with XBLs constituting the small subclass with cut-offs at X-ray (or higher) energies. Under this assumption, we are able to reproduce the X-ray number counts of XBLs starting from the radio counts of RBLs. We also calculate the distribution of radio fluxes of BL Lacs in current and future (deeper) X-ray surveys (e.g ROSAT), wherein we predict that a strong selection effect arising from radio constraints will lead to the preferential discovery of objects of the RBL kind. our hypothesis implies that there is a single family of BL Lacs and that, within this family, XBL-like objects are a small minority, contrary to the common belief that they represent the most numerous class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giommi et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: