Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An open-label, randomized, crossover single-dose study, using two periods and two sequences with a washout period of seven days was conducted to assess the comparative bioavailability of thioctic (alpha-lipoic) acid (ALA) 600 mg formulation and that of a reference formulation. Blood samples were collected up to +6 h post dosing, the plasma was separated, and thioctic acid concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic method with single mass spectrometry detection (HPLC-MS) and a lower limit of quantification of 190.1 ng/ml. Mean values of the individual C(max) were 1338.6 +/- 751.8 ng/ml and 1215.8 +/- 560.5 ng/ml for the test and reference preparations, respectively. Mean +/- standard deviation (SD) total area under the curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUC(t)) was 3510.9 +/- 1088.6 ng x h/ml for the test formulation and 3563.5 +/- 1374.1 ng x h/ml for the reference formulation. Mean +/- SD total area under the curve (AUC(inf)) was 6925.6 +/- 4045.8 ng x h/ml for the test formulation and 7797.1 +/- 5963.1 ng x h/ml for the reference preparation. Terminal elimination half-life was 5.68 +/- 5.05 h for the test and 6.11 +/- 6.15 h for the reference formulations. Time of maximum concentration (t(max)) was 1.24 +/- 1.23 h for the test and 2.05 +/- 1.21 h for the reference formulations. Ninety percent confidence intervals were comprised within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria (80-125%) for all of the parameters analyzed except t(max). The comparison between males and females showed no significant difference for the two drug treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mignini et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: