Key result
Intermittent exercise preserves stroke volume and blunts cardiovascular drift versus continuous exercise.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular drift may occur after approximately 10 minutes of submaximal continuous exercise, and it is unclear if intermittent exercise prevents this phenomenon.
Does intermittent exercise prevent cardiovascular drift compared to continuous exercise in well-trained male cyclists?
Does intermittent exercise prevent cardiovascular drift compared to continuous exercise in well-trained male cyclists?
Intermittent exercise reduces the risk of cardiovascular drift and increases cardiac adaptation potential with less physiological stress compared to continuous exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intermittent exercise may attenuate cardiovascular drift in trained cyclists; leaves open effects on performance or clinical translation.
Cardiovascular drift (CV-Drift) may occur after the ~10th min of submaximal continuous exercising. The purpose of this study was to examine whether CV-Drift is prevented by an intermittent exercise modality, instead of a continuous exercise. Seven well-trained male cyclists volunteered to take part in the study ( V ˙ O2max: 61.7 ± 6.13 mL·min−1·kg−1). Following familiarization sessions, athletes’ individual maximal O2 consumption ( V ˙ O2max), maximum stroke volume responses (SVmax), and cardiac outputs (Qc) were evaluated by a nitrous-oxide re-breathing system and its gas analyzer. Then, continuous exercises were performed 30 min at cyclists’ 60% V ˙ O2max, while intermittent exercises consisted of three 10 min with 1:0.5 workout/recovery ratios at the same intensity. Qc measurements were taken at the 5th, 9th, 12nd, 15th, 20th, 25th, and 30th min of continuous exercises versus 5th and 10th min of workout phases of intermittent exercise modality. Greater than a 5% SV decrement, with accompanying HR, increase, while Qc remained stable and was accepted as CV-Drift criterion. It was demonstrated that there were greater SV responses throughout intermittent exercises when compared to continuous exercises (138.9 ± 17.9 vs. 144.5 ± 14.6 mL, respectively; p ≤ 0.05) and less HR responses (140.1 ± 14.8 vs. 135.2 ± 11.6 bpm, respectively; p ≤ 0.05), while mean Qc responses were similar (19.4 ± 2.1 vs. 19.4 ± 1.5 L, respectively; p > 0.05). Moreover, the mean times spent at peak SV scores of exercise sessions were greater during intermittent exercise (1.5 vs. 10 min) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, intermittent exercises reduce CV-Drift risk and increases cardiac adaptation potentials of exercises with less physiological stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çolakoğlu et al. (2018) studied Cardiovascular drift (n=7). Intermittent exercise vs. Continuous exercise was evaluated on Stroke volume responses (p=≤ 0.05). Intermittent exercise maintained greater stroke volume (144.5 vs. 138.9 mL; p≤0.05) and lower heart rate than continuous exercise, reducing the risk of cardiovascular drift.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: