Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Patient organisations for neuromuscular diseases strongly support systematic screening, primarily to enable early access to treatment, though knowledge of screening techniques remains uneven.
Supports consideration of neuromuscular disease screening; leaves open questions on efficacy, equity, and implementation.
BackgroundThe development of new genetic testing methods and the approval of the first treatments raises questions regarding when and how to perform screening for inherited neuromuscular conditions. Screening directives and access to the different techniques is not uniform across Europe. The patient advisory board of the European reference network for rare neuromuscular diseases (NMD) conducted a qualitative study to understand the state of play of screening for inherited NMD in Europe and the patients’ needs. ResultsWe collected answers from 30 patient organisations (POs) from 18 European countries. Fifteen acknowledge the existence of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in their country. Regarding prenatal screening, we had 25 positive answers and 5 negative ones. Twenty-four POs mentioned that newborn screening was available in their country. We had some contradicting answers from POs from the same country and in some cases; diseases said to be part of the screening programmes were not hereditary disorders. Twenty-eight organisations were in favour of testing. The reasons for the two negative answers were lack of reimbursement and treatment, religious beliefs and eventual insurance constrains. Most POs (21) were in favour of systematic screening with the option to opt-out. Regarding the timing for screening, “at birth” reunites most of the responses.The main priority to perform screening for NMDs was early access to treatment, followed by shorter time to diagnostic, preventive care and genetic counselling. ConclusionsThis is the first study to assess knowledge and needs of POs concerning screening for NMDs. The knowledge of POs regarding screening techniques is quite uneven. This implies that, even in communities highly motivated and knowledgeable of the conditions they advocate for, there is a need for better information. Differences in the responses to the questions “how and when to screen” shows that the screening path depends on the disease specificity and the presence of a disease modifying treatment.The unmet need for screening inherited NMDs should follow an adaptive pathway related to the fast moving medical landscape of NMDs. International coordination leading to a common policy would certainly be a precious asset tending to harmonize the situation amongst European countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamy et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Inherited neuromuscular diseases (n=30). Survey on screening for inherited neuromuscular diseases was evaluated on Knowledge and position on screening for inherited neuromuscular diseases. A survey of 30 European patient organisations revealed that 28 were in favor of screening for inherited neuromuscular diseases, primarily to enable early access to treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: