Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The nine mono-, di-, and tri-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoles have been subjected to flash vacuum pyrolysis at 650–800°, and the products have been isolated and identified. 1,3,5- and 3,4,5-Triphenyl-1,2,4-triazole both gave 1,3-diphenylisoindole in good yield. The formation of this product requires the extrusion of nitrogen from the triazoles, for which a mechanism is suggested involving a [1,5] phenyl shift and the generation of a non-aromatic 3H-1,2,4-triazole intermediate. The four diphenyl-1,2,4-triazoles reacted similarly to give 1-phenylisoindole, which was oxidised during work-up to 3,3′-diphenylbi-1H-isoindol-1-ylidene, and 1-phenyl-1,2,4-triazole gave isoindole, which was isolated as its Diels–Alder adduct with N-phenylmaleimide.3-Phenyl-1,2,4-triazole underwent fragmentation in a different way, giving benzonitrile and cyanamide. From 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazole a highly unstable product, thought to be N-cyano-N-phenylformamidine, was isolated at low temperatures. This product reacted with N-phenylmaleimide to give 2-(N-cyanoanilino)-N-phenyl-succinimide (7) for which a mechanism involving the transient formation of monophenylcarbodi-imide is suggested. An independent synthesis of the cyanamide (7) depended upon the formation of the lithium salt of phenylcyanamide from 1-phenyltetrazole and butyl-lithium.4-(2,4,6-Trimethylphenyl)-1,2,4-triazole gave (2-amino-4,6-dimethylphenyl)acetonitrile (11) on pyrolysis, probably through 2-amino-5,7-dimethyl-3H-indole (10) as intermediate. This amino-indole readily isomerised on pyrolysis to give the phenylacetonitrile (11).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilchrist et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: