Key result
Fentanyl plus midazolam offers superior procedural control and safety over pethidine and diazepam.
Why the study?
Intravenous analgesia and anxiolytics improve patient tolerance and procedural control in interventional radiology, but optimal agents and monitoring require clarification.
Does the use of fentanyl and midazolam improve patient tolerance and procedural control compared to pethidine and diazepam in interventional radiological procedures?
Population
Patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures
Comparison
Fentanyl and midazolam vs pethidine and diazepam
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Fentanyl-midazolam sedation with monitoring may aid procedural tolerance in interventional radiology; leaves open confirmation of safety and efficacy in controlled studies.
Does the use of fentanyl and midazolam improve patient tolerance and procedural control compared to pethidine and diazepam in interventional radiological procedures?
Fentanyl and midazolam provide a safe and effective sedation strategy for interventional radiological procedures, offering better control and reversibility than older agents.
Hiew et al. (1995) conducted a review in Patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures. Fentanyl and midazolam vs. Pethidine and diazepam was evaluated. Fentanyl and midazolam provide an effective and convenient combination for analgesia and sedation in interventional radiology, offering better control and safety compared to pethidine and diazepam.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: