Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The composition of an Al–Cu–Mg ternary eutectic alloy was chosen to be Al–30 wt% Cu–6 wt % Mg to have the Al2Cu and Al2CuMg solid phases within an aluminum matrix (α-Al) after its solidification from the melt. The alloy Al–30 wt % Cu–6 wt % Mg was directionally solidified at a constant temperature gradient (G = 8.55 K/mm) with different growth rates V, from 9.43 to 173.3 μm/s, by using a Bridgman-type furnace. The lamellar eutectic spacings (λE) were measured from transverse sections of the samples. The functional dependencies of lamellar spacings λE ( λ _Al₂CuMg λ A l 2 C u M g and λ _Al₂Cu λ A l 2 C u in μm), microhardness H V (in kg/mm2), tensile strength σT (in MPa), and electrical resistivity ρ (in Ω m) on the growth rate V (in μm/s) were obtained as λ _Al₂CuMg = 3.05V- 0.31 λ A l 2 C u M g = 3.05 V − 0.31 , λ _Al₂Cu = 6.35V- 0.35 λ A l 2 C u = 6.35 V − 0.35 , HV = 308.3( V )- 0.33 H V = 308.3 ( V ) − 0.33 ; σT= 408.6(V)0.14, and ρ = 28.82 × 10–8(V)0.11, respectively for the Al–Cu–Mg eutectic alloy. The bulk growth rates were determined as λ _Al₂CuMg²V = 93.2 λ A l 2 C u M g 2 V = 93.2 and λ _Al₂Cu²V = 195.76 λ A l 2 C u 2 V = 195.76 by using the measured values of λ _Al₂CuMg λ A l 2 C u M g , λ _Al₂Cu λ A l 2 C u and V. A comparison of present results was also made with the previous similar experimental results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaygısız et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: