Key result
Lower socioeconomic status is linked to ~51% lower likelihood of catheter ablation for AF.
Why the study?
The associations between social determinants of health and use of catheter ablation after incident atrial fibrillation, including sex-specific differences and temporal trends, were not well characterized.
Do lower social determinants of health reduce the likelihood of receiving catheter ablation in patients with incident atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=220,752)
Yes
Do lower social determinants of health reduce the likelihood of receiving catheter ablation in patients with incident atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.49 (95% CI 0.45–0.53)
Even in a universal healthcare system, significant socioeconomic disparities exist in the utilization of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Socioeconomic disparities may limit ablation access in incident AF even in universal systems; leaves open whether targeted interventions can reduce inequities.
AIMS: To examine (i) the sex-specific associations between three social determinants of health (SDOH) and use of ablation after incident atrial fibrillation (AF), and (ii) the temporal trends in these associations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study of patients with an incident hospital diagnosis of AF between 2005 and 2018. SDOH at the time of AF diagnosis included three levels of educational attainment, tertile groups of family income, and whether the patient was living alone. Outcome was catheter ablation for AF. We used cause-specific proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI and adjusted for age. To examine temporal trends, we included an interaction term between the exposure and calendar years. Among 122 276 men, those with lower education [HR 0.49 (95%CI 0.45-0.53)] and 0.72 (0.68-0.77) for lower and medium vs. higher], lower income [HR 0.31 (0.27-0.34) and 0.56 (0.52-0.60) for lower and medium vs. higher], and who lived alone [HR 0.60 (0.55-0.64)] were less likely to receive AF ablation. Among 98 476 women, those with lower education [HR 0.45 (0.40-0.50) and 0.83 (0.75-0.91) for lower and medium vs. higher], lower income [HR 0.34 (0.28-0.40) and 0.51 (0.46-0.58) for lower and medium vs. higher], and who lived alone [HR 0.67 (0.61-0.74)] were less likely to receive AF ablation. We found no evidence of temporal trends in the associations. CONCLUSION: In the Danish universal healthcare system, patients with AF who had lower educational attainment, lower family income, or were living alone were less likely to undergo AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinter et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in incident atrial fibrillation (n=220,752). Lower educational attainment, lower family income, and living alone vs. Higher educational attainment, higher family income, and living with others was evaluated on catheter ablation for AF (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.45-0.53). Lower educational attainment (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.45-0.53 in men), lower family income, and living alone were associated with a lower likelihood of undergoing catheter ablation for incident AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: