This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Throughout the paper, rings are associative rings with identity. A ring is called right duo if every right ideal is two-sided, and it is called right p.p. if every principal right ideal is projective. A left duo (p.p.) ring is denned similarly, and a duo (p.p.) ring will mean a ring which is both right and left duo (p.p.). There is a right p.p. ring that is not left p.p. (see Chase [2[). Small [9] proved that right p.p. implies left p.p. if there are no infinite sets of orthogonal idempotents, and Endo [5, Proposition 2] has shown the same implication in the case where each idempotent in the ring is central. Since Courter [3, Theorem 1.3] noted that every idempotent in a right duo ring is central, we can simply speak of right duo p.p. rings. A typical example of a right duo ring which is not left duo is the following. Let F be a field and F(x) the field of rational functions over F. Let R = F(x)× F(x) as an additive group and define the multiplication as follows: Then R is a local artinian ring with c(RR) = 2 and c(RR)= 3. Thus R is right duo but not left due.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatters et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: