Key result
In virtual patient simulations between 2004 and 2011, chlorthalidone use as an initial diuretic increased by 0.7 percentage points per year (P<0.0013), while hydrochlorothiazide use declined by 2 percentage points per year.
Why the study?
Although guidelines treat diuretics as a class, some experts believe chlorthalidone is the preferred diuretic in hypertension management, but its use by physicians was unclear.
Observational (n=37,843)
Although hydrochlorothiazide remains the dominant choice, there is a small but significant increase in the selection of chlorthalidone as a first-line diuretic for hypertension among family physicians in virtual simulations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modest chlorthalidone uptick seen in simulations; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter real-world diuretic selection.
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that chlorthalidone has therapeutic advantages over hydrochlorothiazide, perhaps because of a longer antihypertensive effect. Although guidelines such as the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure treat diuretics as a class, some experts believe chlorthalidone is the diuretic of choice in hypertension management. We evaluated diplomates' use of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide as first-choice diuretics in virtual patient simulations of hypertension in the American Board of Family Medicine Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians self-assessment modules. METHODS: We examined action logs for hypertension simulations completed between 2004 and 2011 and identified initial antihypertensive choices made by diplomates. We tabulated uses of any diuretic as initial treatment, distinguishing between chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, and other diuretic choices. We examined trends in the use of diuretics and chlorthalidone in simulations using linear models. RESULTS: Chlorthalidone use increased 0.7 percentage points per year (test for β >0, P < .0013), from approximately 1.3% of simulation prescriptions in 2004 to about 4.8% in 2010 and 2011, whereas hydrochlorothiazide prescriptions fell 2 percentage points per year (P = .035), from nearly 57% to 47%. As a fraction of all diuretic use, chlorthalidone increased 1.4 percentage points per year (P = .0006), from 2% to 9%. CONCLUSIONS: Small but growing numbers of diplomates are heeding recommendations in the growing literature to start with chlorthalidone rather than hydrochlorothiazide, at least in the virtual patient environment. Observed choices in virtual patient management strongly imply that this is a valid topic for additional attention in the hypertension self-assessment module.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagen et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Hypertension (virtual patient simulations) (n=37,843). Chlorthalidone prescription vs. Hydrochlorothiazide prescription was evaluated on Trend in chlorthalidone use as initial antihypertensive prescription (0.7 percentage points per year increase, p=<0.0013). In virtual patient simulations between 2004 and 2011, chlorthalidone use as an initial diuretic increased by 0.7 percentage points per year (P<0.0013), while hydrochlorothiazide use declined by 2 percentage points per year.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: