Key result
Carotid plaque area ≥0.36 cm² linked to ~5-fold higher odds of symptomatic mild stenosis.
Why the study?
The extent to which internal carotid artery stenosis 20-40% causes ischemic cerebrovascular events is uncertain.
Does larger plaque cross-sectional area and length correlate with symptomatic status in patients with 20-40% ICA stenosis?
Observational (n=41)
No
Does larger plaque cross-sectional area and length correlate with symptomatic status in patients with 20-40% ICA stenosis?
Odds Ratio: 5.54 (95% CI 1.2–25.6)
p-value: p=0.028
Larger plaque cross-sectional area (≥0.36 cm2) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke or TIA in patients with low-grade (20-40%) internal carotid artery stenosis.
Background: Around 9-15% of ischemic strokes are related to internal carotid artery (ICA)-stenosis ≥50%. However, the extent to which ICA-stenosis <50% causes ischemic cerebrovascular events is uncertain. We examined the relation between plaque cross-sectional area and length and the risk of ischemic stroke or TIA among patients with ICA-stenosis 20-40%. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, from January 2011 until September 2016 with ischemic stroke or TIA and concomitant ICA-stenosis 20-40%, either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Plaque length and cross-sectional area were assessed on ultrasound scans. Results: We identified 41 patients with ischemic stroke or TIA and ICA-stenosis 20-40%; 14 symptomatic and 27 asymptomatic. The plaque cross-sectional area was significantly larger among symptomatic rather than asymptomatic ICA-stenosis; median (IQR) were 0.45 (0.21-0.69) cm2 and 0.27 (0.21-0.38) cm2, p=0.03, respectively. A plaque cross-sectional area ≥0.36 cm2 had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 74%, in favor of symptomatic rather than asymptomatic ICA-stenosis. In a sex-adjusted multivariate logistic regression, a plaque cross-sectional area ≥0.36 cm2 and a plaque length ≥1.65 cm were associated with an OR (95% CI) of 5.54 (1.2-25.6), p=0.028 and 1.78 (0.36-8.73), p=0.48, respectively, for symptomatic ICA-stenosis. Conclusion: Large plaques might increase the risk of ischemic stroke or TIA among patients with low-grade ICA-stenosis 20-40%. Sufficiently powered prospective longitudinal cohort studies are needed to definitively test the stroke risk stratification value of carotid plaque length and cross-sectional area in the setting of current optimal medical treatment alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhfnawy et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Internal carotid artery stenosis of 20-40% (n=41). Plaque cross-sectional area ≥0.36 cm2 vs. Plaque cross-sectional area <0.36 cm2 was evaluated on Symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis (OR 5.54, 95% CI 1.2-25.6, p=0.028). A plaque cross-sectional area ≥0.36 cm2 was significantly associated with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis of 20-40% compared to asymptomatic stenosis (OR 5.54).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: