The 2021 European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines: adding albuminuria to the SCORE scale increases the prevalence of very high/high cardiovascular risk among patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common condition worldwide [1]; however, it is vastly underdiagnosed as it frequently remains asymptomatic until reaching advanced stages [2]. Thus, in Spain, the prevalence of diagnosed CKD among adults is only 5%, far lower than in nationwide, population-based studies [3]. The CKD prevalence is expected to increase in the future, as the population becomes older and the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, the leading causes of CKD, grows [2]. The 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines of dyslipidemia classify severe CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2], and moderate CKD (eGFR 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2) as having very high and high cardiovascular (CV) risk, respectively, without requiring Systematic COronary Risk Estimation (SCORE) [4]. However, CV risk is increased by both decreased renal function and albuminuria [3]. Thus, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines include both parameters in the stratification of CV disease risk [5]. The 2021 ESC guidelines on CV disease prevention have added albuminuria to renal function for CV risk stratification [6]. As a result, it would be of great interest to analyze the impact of this new classification on CKD patients. For this purpose, we analyzed the impact on CV risk stratification of CKD patients, adopting the 2021 ESC guidelines by using BIG-PAC®, a database with information from 1.8 million non-selected persons of primary health care centers and referral hospitals within the Spanish national health system [1]. Adult patients, with one or more diagnostic code of CKD or having laboratory results meeting the definition of CKD, were included. CKD stages were defined according to eGFR (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) criteria: CKD stage 1: eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR ≥30 mg/g; CKD stage 2: eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR ≥30 mg/g; CKD stage 3a: eGFR 45–59 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD stage 3b: eGFR 30–44 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD stage 4: eGFR 15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2; and CKD stage 5: eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 [1]. CV risk was classified according to 2021 ESC guidelines versus 2019 ESC guidelines (Table 1) [4, 6]. Categorical variables were described by their absolute and relative frequencies and were compared with the Chi-squared test or the Fisher exact test, when appropriate. CV risk stratification according to 2019 ESC lipid guidelines and 2021 ESC CVD prevention guidelines No CKD patient is eligible for moderate risk, i.e. patients with CKD and T2DM not fulfilling very high risk criteria should be included directly as high risk patients. This criterion has not been included in 2021 ESC guidelines, but was added to classify all CKD patients. ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BP: blood pressure; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DM: diabetes mellitus; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; FH: familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SCORE: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation; SCORE2: Systemic COronary Risk Estimation 2; SCORE2-OP: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation 2-older persons (table used is for low-risk countries, as data are from Spain); T1DM: type 1 DM; T2DM: type 2 DM; TC: total cholesterol; TOD: target organ damage; UACR: urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Table adapted from reference numbers [4] and [6]. CV risk stratification according to 2019 ESC lipid guidelines and 2021 ESC CVD prevention guidelines No CKD patient is eligible for moderate risk, i.e. patients with CKD and T2DM not fulfilling very high risk criteria should be included directly as high risk patients. This criterion has not been included in 2021 ESC guidelines, but was added to classify all CKD patients. ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BP: blood pressure; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DM: diabetes mellitus; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; FH: familial hypercholesterolemia; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SCORE: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation; SCORE2: Systemic COronary Risk Estimation 2; SCORE2-OP: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation 2-older persons (table used is for low-risk countries, as data are from Spain); T1DM: type 1 DM; T2DM: type 2 DM; TC: total cholesterol; TOD: target organ damage; UACR: urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Table adapted from reference numbers [4] and [6]. Of 56 435 (4.91%) patients with CKD, 26 955 (47.8%) were women. According to 2019 ESC guidelines, 34.7%, 45.3%, 16.3% and 3.7% of patients had very high, high, moderate and low CV risk, respectively (80.0% very high/high CV risk). With the 2021 risk stratification, these numbers were 36.7%, 53.6%, 7.2% and 0%, respectively; P < 0.001 in all cases (90.3% very high/high CV risk). Therefore, ESC 2021 criteria increased the prevalence of very high and high CV risk CKD patients as compared with the 2019 ESC guidelines (absolute difference: +2.0% and +8.3%; relative difference: +5.8% and +18.3%, respectively; both P < 0.001), both in women and in men (Table 2). CV risk stratification of CKD patients according to 2019 ESC lipid guidelines and 2021 ESC CVD prevention guidelines ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DM: diabetes mellitus; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; FH: familial hypercholesterolemia; SCORE: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation; SCORE2: Systemic COronary Risk Estimation 2; SCORE2-OP: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation 2-older persons; T1DM: type 1 DM; T2DM: type 2 DM; TOD: target organ damage; UACR: urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. TOD: eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 irrespective of albuminuria, eGFR 45–59 mL/min/1.73 m2 and microalbuminuria (UACR 30–300 mg/g), proteinuria (UACR >300 mg/g) or presence of microvascular disease in at least three different sites (e.g. microalbuminuria plus retinopathy plus neuropathy). bSCORE2 and SCORE2-OP were not calculated, as all patients had CKD. cThis criterion has not been included in 2021 ESC guidelines, but was added to classify all CKD patients. dAlready included in the other subgroups. eThese patients had the diagnosis of CKD, but data about eGFR were not available. UACR: mg/g; eGFR: mL/min/1.73 m2. CV risk stratification of CKD patients according to 2019 ESC lipid guidelines and 2021 ESC CVD prevention guidelines ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DM: diabetes mellitus; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; FH: familial hypercholesterolemia; SCORE: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation; SCORE2: Systemic COronary Risk Estimation 2; SCORE2-OP: Systematic COronary Risk Estimation 2-older persons; T1DM: type 1 DM; T2DM: type 2 DM; TOD: target organ damage; UACR: urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. TOD: eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 irrespective of albuminuria, eGFR 45–59 mL/min/1.73 m2 and microalbuminuria (UACR 30–300 mg/g), proteinuria (UACR >300 mg/g) or presence of microvascular disease in at least three different sites (e.g. microalbuminuria plus retinopathy plus neuropathy). bSCORE2 and SCORE2-OP were not calculated, as all patients had CKD. cThis criterion has not been included in 2021 ESC guidelines, but was added to classify all CKD patients. dAlready included in the other subgroups. eThese patients had the diagnosis of CKD, but data about eGFR were not available. UACR: mg/g; eGFR: mL/min/1.73 m2. These data suggest that although with some limitations, adding albuminuria, as ESC 2021 guidelines on CV prevention did, could improve the risk stratification accuracy. Of note, preventing the development and progression of CKD (renal function and albuminuria) with renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, and more recently, with sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, with also a positive impact on CV disease, is mandatory [7–10]. Therefore, an improved CV risk stratification may be helpful to better identify those patients that would benefit more from these therapies. None declared.