Inspiratory pressure–volume curves at different positive end‐expiratory pressure levels in patients with ALI/ARDS

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

BACKGROUND: In lung protective strategy, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) slightly higher than the Pflex (the airway pressure corresponding to the lower inflection point (LIP) on the inspiratory pressure-volume (P-V) curve measured with ZEEP) is generally recommended. However, this method to determine optimal PEEP lacks a theoretical background and there is no clinical report that investigated how the P-V relationship would be with such PEEP. Therefore, we measured inspiratory P-V curves at different PEEP levels to increase our knowledge about the inspiratory P-V curve with PEEP. METHODS: In eight consecutive patients with ALI/ARDS, inspiratory P-V curves were repeatedly measured at different PEEP levels by low flow inflation technique and LIP was assessed in all inspiratory P-V curves. Afterwards, the minimum PEEP level at which LIP was not identifiable (PEEP(LIP)(-)) was determined and the relationship between Pflex and PEEP(LIP)(-) was investigated. RESULTS: Pflex and PEEP(LIP)(-) could be determined in all patients. Pflex was 9.4+/-2.0 cmH2O (range: 7 to 12 cmH2O) and PEEP(LIP)(-) was 7.9+/-1.6 cmH2O (range: 5 to 10 cmH2O) (mean+/-SD, P=0.0877). PEEP(LIP)(-) was lower than the Pflex in five patients, and significantly lower than the Pflex + 2 cmH2O (P=0.0024). CONCLUSION: From the analysis of inspiratory P-V curves at different PEEP levels, PEEP 2 cmH2O higher than the Pflex may not be necessary to prevent cyclic collapse and reopening of alveoli, at least in some ALI/ARDS patients. Further studies are needed to confirm this preliminary result.