Key result
Goal-directed fluid therapy cuts ICU morbidity ~56% vs. conventional therapy.
Why the study?
The impact of intraoperative goal-directed therapy using Vigileo/FloTrac on postoperative morbidities and mortality in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries was unclear.
Does intraoperative goal-directed therapy using Vigileo/FloTrac reduce postoperative morbidities, mortality, and length of stay in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgeries?
RCT (n=86)
randomized
Does intraoperative goal-directed therapy using Vigileo/FloTrac reduce postoperative morbidities, mortality, and length of stay in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgeries?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.3% vs 37.2%
p-value: p=0.039
Intraoperative goal-directed therapy using Vigileo/FloTrac reduces postoperative morbidities and length of stay, but not mortality, in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
GDT may reduce ICU morbidity and shorten stays in high-risk abdominal surgery; leaves open mortality impact and routine adoption pending larger trials.
BackgroundThis study evaluated impact of intraoperative goal-directed therapy (GDT) judged by changes of stroke volume variation (SVV) and cardiac index (CI) using the Vigileo/FloTrac system on postoperative (PO) morbidities and mortality rates in high risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgeries in comparison to conventional fluid therapy (CT).Methods86 patients were randomly allocated into one of two equal groups: CT group = 43 patients received crystalloid solution and on demand bolus of 250 ml colloids with possible addition of vasopressor or inotrope to target MAP at 60–90 mmHg, CVP at 8–12 mmHg and urine output at >0.5 ml/kg/hr and GDT group = 43 patients received crystalloid fluid therapy (FT) and colloids (3 ml/kg) with possible addition of vasopressor or inotrope according to predefined protocol with a target CI 2.5 L/min/m2, SVV < 12% with MAP > 65 mmHg. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) was used to predict morbidity and mortality rates. Study outcomes included ICU and total hospital morbidity and mortality rates and length of stay (LOS).ResultsIntraoperative GDT reduced ICU morbidity rate (16.3%) than the POSSUM predicted rate (39.78%) and significantly (p = 0.039) than CT group (37.2%), while in CT group ICU morbidity rate coincided with POSSUM predicted rate (42.86%). ICU and total hospital LOS were significantly shorter with GDT group than with CT group. However, mortality rates weren’t significantly lower with GDT group than CT group (7% vs. 11.6%). The applied protocol for intraoperative GDT reduced significantly crystalloid infusion and despite of significantly higher amount of received colloids, the total amount of FT was significantly less than CT group.ConclusionThe applied protocol for intraoperative GDT provided significant reduction of PO morbidities, ICU and hospital LOS but couldn‘t significantly reduce mortality rates in high risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgeries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elgendy et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in High-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgeries (n=86). Intraoperative goal-directed therapy (GDT) using Vigileo/FloTrac vs. Conventional fluid therapy (CT) was evaluated on ICU morbidity rate (p=0.039). Intraoperative goal-directed therapy using the Vigileo/FloTrac system significantly reduced the ICU morbidity rate compared to conventional fluid therapy (16.3% vs. 37.2%; p=0.039).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: