Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While there is evidence for effective in-school programmes for struggling beginning readers, the evidence in relation to after-school interventions focusing on academic outcomes is particularly weak. This study seeks to contribute to this body of evidence through a randomised trial (n = 464) of an after-school literacy programme (Doodle Den) for struggling beginning readers in a deprived area of Dublin, Ireland. The programme based on a balanced literacy framework, was delivered in group settings, and had a strong focus on staff development. Doodle Den was found to improve the children's overall literacy (d = +0.17), teacher assessments of their literacy ability (d = +0.28) and to positively impact on problem behaviours in regular school class (d = −0.18). The implications for the development of after-school programmes are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biggart et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: