Key result
Protocol outlines planned network meta-analysis comparing medical, surgical, and interventional PDA closure strategies.
Why the study?
The effect of different interventions for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in children remains controversial, necessitating a comprehensive comparison of their efficacy and safety.
Do different interventions (pharmacological, surgical, interventional) differ in efficacy and safety for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in children?
Meta-Analysis
Do different interventions (pharmacological, surgical, interventional) differ in efficacy and safety for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in children?
This is a protocol for a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological, surgical, and interventional treatments for patent ductus arteriosus in children.
No change to patent ductus arteriosus management; protocol extends research by enabling future network meta-analysis of interventions.
INTRODUCTION: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases. Once the PDA is diagnosed, it needs to be dealt with in time. At present, main methods include pharmacological treatment, surgical closure, and interventional closure for treatment of PDA. However, the effect of different interventions in PDA management is still controversial. Thus, our study aims to assess the effectiveness of different interventions together and estimate the sequence of these therapies for PDA children. Meanwhile, it is necessary to conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the safety of different interventions comprehensively. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of different interventions for the treatment of PDA. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, gray literature, and trial registry databases were searched from inception to December 2022. We will extract and report data according to methodological guidelines for Bayesian network meta-analysis by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). Primary PDA closure, overall PDA closure, technical success, surgical success rate, mortality during hospital stay, operation time, intensive care unit stay, intraoperative radiation dose, radiation exposure time, total postoperative complication rate, and postoperative major complication rate will be defined as the outcomes. The quality of all random studies will be assessed using ROB, and quality of evidence for all outcomes will be judged by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. Since no private and confidential patient data will be contained in the reporting, there are no ethical considerations associated with this protocol. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY2020110067.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Pharmacological, surgical, and interventional treatments vs. Surgical ligation or placebo was evaluated on Primary PDA closure, overall PDA closure, and technical success. As a study protocol for a network meta-analysis, this paper outlines the methodology to compare interventions for patent ductus arteriosus but reports no clinical findings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: