Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines the effects of an export tax (on a processed resource good), the number of harvesters and an afforestation policy in a small, open economy with urban unemployment. The export tax increases the urban unemployment rate, but improves the quality of the environment. Here, the optimal export tax is lower than the adjusted marginal environmental damage. Reducing the number of harvesters has a similar resource allocation effect to that of an export tax. However, the afforestation policy can resolve the trade‐off between urban unemployment and the quality of the environment and may also improve the welfare of a country.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abe et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: