Key result
Intermittent ventricular preexcitation at low heart rates does not rule out high-risk pathway conduction.
Why the study?
Intermittent ventricular preexcitation at low heart rates does not exclude the presence of an accessory pathway with high-risk conduction properties during follow-up.
Case Report (n=1)
Intermittent ventricular preexcitation documented at low heart rates does not reliably exclude the presence of an accessory pathway with high-risk conduction properties.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pacemaker implantation without pathway ablation risks rapid preexcited arrhythmias in intermittent preexcitation; leaves open optimal pre-implant risk stratification.
A 66-year-old man with known asymptomatic preexcitation was admitted to our department for symptomatic complete infranodal atrioventricular block and scarce intermittent anterograde conduction through the atrioventricular accessory pathway. The accessory pathway was not further stratified due to evidence of intermittent conduction with a sinus node heart rate of 60 bpm, and a bicameral pacemaker was implanted. Surprisingly, after 4 months, the patient developed preexcited, rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation and ultimately underwent successful accessory pathway catheter ablation. Even when intermittent ventricular preexcitation is documented at low heart rates, it does not exclude the presence of an accessory pathway with high-risk conduction properties during follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sciarretta et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Asymptomatic preexcitation and complete infranodal atrioventricular block (n=1). Bicameral pacemaker implantation and accessory pathway catheter ablation was evaluated on Development of preexcited, rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation. Intermittent ventricular preexcitation documented at low heart rates does not exclude the presence of an accessory pathway with high-risk conduction properties during follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: